Models of Information System Security

ACME New Facitlity

Questions: Errand 1a). In your job as the Project Manager for the usage of Acmes new facility,you are required to depict the fundamental standards of the undertaking the board processas they can be connected to the venture lifecycle. You will do this in chart form(making utilization of a model outline as given in class) demonstrating how your venture fits into that model. (LO1.1)b). Recommend reasonable achievement/disappointment models for your new undertaking and, in doing this,you consider both procedure and result rules just as inward factors and therequirements of Acme Products themselves as the proprietor of the project.c). Venture the executives is worried about a few targets simultaneously and these regularly gone under the headings of time, cost and quality. Clarify, withexamples connected to every one of these targets, how venture the executives frameworks and procedures are intended to add to every one of these goals on account of theAcme Project.d) Explain how you will end the Acme Project, ensuring that your clarification incorporates the key components you will survey just as the things you will remember for your post-venture appraisal.Task 2a) List the fundamental members in the Acme Project giving a clarification of the jobs and duties of every one of the members remembered for your list.b) Draw up and clarify a reasonable authoritative structure for the Acme Project. (It is basic that you incorporate a diagram.)c) Identify and legitimize the abilities and characteristics you ought to have as a pioneer for the Acme Project.The City College HND in Business Project Management for Business September 2015d) Specify the human asset prerequisites for the Acme Project at that point clarify and legitimize the specialized and individual qualities you expect of the individuals youintend to remember for your Project Team.e) Develop, in chart structure, a layout work breakdown structure of close to three levels for the Acme Project.Task 3a) Using the accompanying rund own of assignments, draw up a system outline and locate the basic way for the venture underneath. What is the last span of the project?b) In the undertaking portrayed by the system in Task 3a, you are informed that the development of the creation apparatus will take longer than arranged by eightweeks. You should educate your customer regarding any outcome of this postponement: what do you say? You are then educated by your provider that your gracefully of crude materials hasbeen influenced by flooding and that you won't have the option to begin sourcing until about a month and a half later than arranged. What is the impact of this deferral and what may you doabout it?c) Explain, with your own models. How a Gantt Chart and a Resource Histogram may be utilized so as to improve the administration of your project.c) Explain how you may have the option to Crash a few exercises during your venture so as to complete the task more quickly.d) Explain how you will investigate Cost and Time ex ecution for your undertaking during its venture life.e) Explain how you will deal with any progressions that are probably going to be required during the life of your project.f) When and in what manner will you close the task? What befalls the structure and creation line once you have finished your undertakings as task manager?g) Explain how you will assess the finished venture for example by what method will you choose if it has it been a triumph or a disappointment? You ought to likewise incorporate techniques for estimating the exhibition of an undertaking as they will apply to the Acme Project Answers: Presentation The ACME Products Plc has a wide assortment of client database beginning from creation to coordinations. Presently the association has chosen to plant another creation office to satisfy the expanding need for their items in the market. Consequently, the Board of Directors of the dynamic bodies for the association have discharged this undertaking to introduce a perspective on the structure of the task by applying standards of venture the board and assess the achievement or disappointment measures of the venture. This report centers around the different standards of venture the executives that can be applied to the achievement or disappointment models estimation of an undertaking. The term venture the board means to the order containing commencement, get ready arranging, execution, controlling and closeout of the exercises of the task group to gain certain objectives and meet explicit achievement models. Errand 1: Understanding of Project Management Principles 1.1 Description of Project Background and Principles of Project at ACME Product PLC 1.1.1 Background of the Project for ACME Product PLC The principle target of the task is to plan another assembling office for a business association named ACME Products Plc that manages the assembling and creation of plastic silverware. The venture will likewise incorporate the development of another structure, establishment of creation hardware, dealing with the flexibly of crude material and assembling just as conveyance of the completed items. The undertaking will likewise concentrate on the course of action for creation in the new office and mix of that with the current production lines in different pieces of the nation. The venture will be structured with the assistance of undertaking the board basics that will convey to assess the achievement or disappointment of the task. 1.1.2 Key Principles of the Project Management at ACME Product PLC There are certain principles, which ought to must be taken after when dealing with exercises. As indicated by Botchkarev and Finnigan (2015), sketched out that there are seven fundamental standards inside an undertaking the board procedure. Achievement - While undertaking of this ACME Project, the center was trustworthy for the accomplishment of the task. The achievement ought to be considered with keeping up all standards in ACME Product PLC venture. Duty - The organization and the associates must be centered around the errand before it comes energetically. This infers there must be a concession to the goals, scope, quality, course of events and the cost of the assignment between everyone. Exchange off Triangle - This standard just suggests that degree, quality, time, and cost must be plausible and they should exist in a balanced state for an errand to make it is empowering (Clements and Gido 2012). Any of these factors can't be changed without affecting the others. Correspondence Channels - A single channel of correspondence must exist between the venture support and the assignment bunch pioneer for all decisions impacting the aftereffect of the endeavor. Social Environment - The framework for organization must match the kind of assignment and the current status of the venture with the goal that the gathering can convey its best of yield. The gathering must be regulated such that engages and underpins them. Procedure - For any endeavor to succeed, philosophy and approaches must be undeniably said and ought to be documented. It should communicate the parts; commitments and arrangements must be joined into procedures. These systems fill in as helpers all through the life expectancy of the task. (Source: Randolph 2012, pp-81) Task Lifecycle - This standard incorporates the organizing and the execution times of the endeavor. On an essential level, masterminding goes before utilization. This ensures a clear way and chooses basic defining moments in the responsibility (Cooke and Tate 2011). By taking after this, we can get a sensible picture on deciding when the assignment starts and when it should end. 1.2 Evaluation of Success/Failure Criteria for the Project These are the helpful segments and feature that, when completed, make up the finishing deliverable for the endeavor. Resources here are the cost and the budgetary sponsorship assigned the specific venture to be done. The ACME Product PLC ought to consider in this models about the Key Performance Indicators for making the achievement recognized under the undertaking. The achievement factors are chosen with progressively explicit methodologies of Post Performance Review reports, venture appraisal and assessment bookkeeping the markers too. The dedication of progress ought to be considered as partner fulfillment, their duty goals, and ideal conveyance of results, cost use, and nature of execution. In this task, the three factors as amount, time, and cost adjusted in part of fruition and appropriate alterations in each perspective. In ACME Product PLC, there must be appropriate channels and meetings for correspondence and important connection process as in conversation, eye to eye collab oration, basic data sharing, and others. The schedule insinuates the specific time required and circulated to make a deliverable (Dalcher 2013). In this circumstance of the ACME Project, this would be the outcome of the endeavor. Right when every one of these models will be met in the ACME Project, the accomplishment pace of the undertaking will be satisfied. On the off chance that the benefit and time are more used than the distributed aggregate and if the degree of the venture isn't accomplished, it will achieve the assignment to meet dissatisfaction. 1.3 Explanation of the Principles of Systems and Procedures of Project Management Overseeing improvement ventures is significantly embedded in the ordinary structure procurement system. Edge (2014) fights that time, cost and quality are the achievable essential objectives of the client in any advancement venture. Regardless of the way that it is ensured that time, cost and quality are intertwined in the organization of advancement ventures, inquire about has shown that in truth a period cost inclination exists. Time: By the ACME Project it tends to be expressed that a limited organization effort is required to complete an improvement venture on schedule, and this planned organization endeavor will control the two costs likewise, quality (Dinsmore and Cabanis 2011). Cost: Customers have been continuously worried about the general profitability of exercises and the duty of endeavors generally. In this manner

Ethical Principles and Codes of Practice Essay Example for Free

Moral Principles and Codes of Practice Essay Moral standards and codes of training can give direction in everyday practice. Examine Peter’s circumstance for the situation study and arrive at a decision about what might be a proper reaction. This article will examine the moral standards and code of training comparable to the contextual investigation of Peter, a man experiencing Alzheimer’s illness and will recommend a strategy for Peter’s circumstance dependent on the use of these standards and the code. It will do this by inspecting the term ‘ethics’ and will concentrate on four moral standards saw as comparative with the sorts of moral issues and difficulties met inside wellbeing and social consideration settings, these will be applied to the contextual investigation. Peter’s circumstance is that of a man, who, in line with his family, despondently (however clearly fundamentally), moved to Parkside Manor, a little private consideration home. Generally Peter’s state of Alzheimer’s ailment has progressed and he has gotten dynamically uninhibited. His conduct has made the staff question Peter’s arrangement at the consideration home, as a portion of different inhabitants are starting to get pained and troubled by his conduct. Some staff feel that with the quantity of occupants requiring consideration, Peter’s needs require additional time than they need to give. Anyway Peter’s family are unflinching in their choice for him to stay at Parkside. ‘Ethics’ are characterized as ‘the philosophical investigation of the virtue of human direct and of the guidelines and rules that should administer it’ (Collins, 2006, p535). Singular qualities create after some time through socialization, childhood and encounters. These qualities when seen on an individual level, control singular activities. People working in the wellbeing and social consideration setting additionally hold proficient qualities got from proficient preparing and belief system. Choices are made utilizing both individual and expert qualities and all choices will have a moral measurement. Truly wellbeing and social consideration experts have been coordinated by standards and direction, empowering them to create wh at is portrayed as an expert ethical quality. Codes of training have for some time been viewed as guidelines managing practice, with away from of lead (General Social Care Council, 2010, p 4). These typically incorporate some exclusion’s, for example, divulgence of data however they fundamentally portray anticipated types of direct. In regions of wellbeing and social consideration moral standards are utilized alongside codes of training to guide and upgrade the dynamic procedure. These standards are identified with a feeling of making the best decision or that which is good and with thoughts of what is acceptable and terrible practice (K217, Book 4, p28).This thought can be tricky and can be seen both unbiasedly and abstractly. Whenever saw from a target perspective, who ought to be trusted to realize what is the goal truth? In the event that abstract, who is the one whose sentiment ought to be tuned in to? Questions, for example, these are frequently at the center of issues. Experts working inside wellbeing and social consideration situations don't simply manage choices dependent on the privilege and great. Thought ought to likewise be given to ‘ethical dilem mas’, these are circumstances when two decisions are evident, both equivalent in profound quality and morals (K217, Book4, p29). Pattison and Heller (2001) recommend, morals and worth issues clear a path through typical, day by day human services practice, the translation of which is available to more than one clarification (K217, Offprints, p131). Despite the fact that standards control activities, there is as yet a need to survey a circumstance and devise a suitable reaction. This appraisal and reaction get from an individual’s qualities and preparing as much as from standards. Moral standards are significant in the field of wellbeing and social consideration. Experts need to be able to make educated, moral and legitimate choices identifying with the people in their consideration. This can be troublesome when confronted with a difficult case. Utilizing a system to build up an organized perspective through a specific moral circumstance or challenge can be useful. The ETHICS system was created to help individuals working in care settings and offers an organized method of evaluating a strategy so as to g o to a morally educated choice. It stresses the should have the option to choose a strategy dependent on direction, data and set up standards, just as the individual’s convictions. The structure expects specialists to right off the bat, Enquire about the pertinent realities of the case, Think about the choices that are accessible to all included, Hear the perspectives on everybody (counting administration client, relatives and important suppliers), Identify any significant moral standards and qualities which may assist with directing the decisionâ€making procedure, Clarify the significance and results of any key qualities lastly Select a strategy offering supporting contentions (K217, Book4, p32). When considering the contextual investigation, four moral standards will be inspected. These are: regard for self-sufficiency, non-impropriety, helpfulness and equity. The standards are viewed as the beginning stages for the improvement of moral ways to deal with care work on, giving a reasonable arrangement of standards, which as opposed to offering straightforward replies answers to moral quandaries, set out valuable core values for professionals when confronted with disputable choices (K217, Book 4, p34). In Peter’s circumstance, Autonomy or self-assurance is perplexing. Regard for Autonomy alludes to a guarantee to regard the dynamic ability of a self-sufficient person. Independence is the opportunity to go about as an individual wishes, to have the option to settle on choices about their own life and not to be constrained by others. The contextual investigation calls attention to that Peter ‘unhappily’ left his home, in line with his family to move into Parkside Manor, showing that Peter had no power over this circumstance. This absence of option to pick where he lives, straightforwardly encroaches on Peter’s capacity to be independent and settle on contemplated educated decisions. Beauchamp and Childress (2009) recognize two territories fundamental for self-rule: Liberty or autonomy from control and Agency, the limit with regards to think activity (K217, Book 4, p39). While applying this rule to Peter’s case, it could be contended that a finding of Alzheimer’s limits his abilities to settle on choices for himself, constraining limit with regards to purposeful activity thus lessening Peter’s capacity to work as a self-ruling person. The codes of training for social consideration laborers (2010) state: ‘a social consideration specialist must regard the privileges of administration clients while looking to guarantee that their conduct doesn't hurt themselves or others’ (General Social Care Council, 2010, p9, 4.2). This causes an irreconcilable situation between Peter’s rights to act in a way that he picks and that of different occupants, who have the right to have the option to move unreservedly about the home without the danger of being vexed or upset by Peter’s activities. Staff may wish to find a way to limit the potential danger of Peter’s conduct making mental damage and upset different inha bitants and by following danger appraisal approaches could survey the potential dangers in this circumstance (General Social Care Council, 2010, p9, 4.2). Distinguishing unsafe conduct is multifaceted and not entirely clear. The evaluation of hazard could have genuine ramifications for Peter maybe prompting a constraining of his privileges and freedom in light of a legitimate concern for shielding others from hurt (K217, Book 4, p60). In this manner over assurance or superfluous constraint could be viewed as an encroachment upon Peter’s human rights (K217, Book 4 p65). The contextual investigation doesn't precisely bring up if Peter has the psychological ability to comprehend that his activities could be problematic and upsetting for other people. This being the situation it might likewise be suitable to converse with both Peter and his family about the circumstance so as to discover an answer. As the code of training keeps up, ‘care laborers must advance the freedom of administration clients and help them to comprehend and practice their rights’ (General Social Care Council, 2010, p8, 3.1). It is recommended, that in situations where dynamic limit is regarded to be weakened, regard f or self-rule may include the consideration specialist acting suitably in an individual’s ‘best interests’ (K217, Book 4, p40). The trouble here is that Peters eventual benefits can't be seen without considering the eventual benefits of different occupants, care laborers and family members. This shows the restrictions of the code of training in taking a tight moral view as opposed to attempting to take a more extensive and progressively adjusted viewpoint. Helpfulness and the advancement of government assistance are worried about the arrangement of advantages and the parity of these against hazard in the consideration and treatment of administration clients. It necessitates that care suppliers make a positive commitment to help other people, not simply cease from demonstrations of damage. It could be contended that in Peter’s case, moving into a private setting might be viewed as ‘doing good’. The hypothesis of helpfulness or ‘doing good’ is installed in wellbeing and social consideration practice. Albeit, as opposed to being clear in its endeavors to illuminate moral situations, helpfulness can be seen as being somewhat unclear (K217, Book4, p34). The utilization of advantage in Peter’s circumstance could be viewed as a dubious o ne. The need to ‘do good’ in this circumstance could be believed to be against Peter’s eventual benefits, as on account of assent. The contextual analysis suggests the way that Peter’s family are settling on choices on b

Going, Inc.

Rundown of Ministers and Advisors | SL| Name| Designation| Joining Date | Distribution of Ministry/Division | Name| From| To| | 1| Sheik Hasinaâ | Prime Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Armed Forces Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Cabinet Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Ministry of Defense  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Ministry of Public Administration  | 28-04-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 2| Mr. Abul Maal Abdul Muhithâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Finance  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Finance Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Economic Relations Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | |Internal Resources Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Bank and Financial Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 3| Begum Matia Chowdhuryâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Agriculture  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 4| Mr. Abdul Latif Siddiqueâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Textiles and Jute  | 6-01-2009â | Ti ll Dateâ | | 5| Barrister Shafique Ahmedâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Law and Justice Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Legislative and Parliamentary Affairs Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | |Parliament Secretariat  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 6| Air Vice Marshal (Rtd. ) A K Khandkerâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Planning  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Planning Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Statistics and Informatics Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 7| Mr. Rajiuddin Ahmed Rajuâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Labor and Employment  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 8| Advocate Shahara Khatunâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Posts and Tele-Communications  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | Syed Ashraful Islamâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-agents  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Local Government Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Rural Development and Co-agents Division  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 10| Engr. Khandker Mosharraf Hossainâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Expatriates’ Welfare and Overseas Employment  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 11| Mr. Suranjit Sen Guptaâ | Ministerâ | 28-11-2011â | Without portfolio. | 17-04-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 12| Dr. Muhiuddin Khan Alamgirâ | Ministerâ | 15-09-2012â | Ministry of Home Affairs  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | 13| Mr. Md. Rezaul Karim Hiraâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Land  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 14| Mr. Abul Kalam Azadâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Cultural Affairs  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 15| Mr. Enamul Hoque Mustafa Shaheedâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Social Welfare  | 6-01-2009â | T ill Dateâ | | 16| Mr. Dilip Baruaâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Industries  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 17| Mr. Obaidul Quaderâ | Ministerâ | 28-11-2011â | Ministry of Communications  | 5-12-2011â | Till Dateâ | | Roads Division  | 5-12-2011â | Till Dateâ | | |Bridges Division  | 5-11-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 18| Mr. Ramesh Chandra Senâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Water Resources  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 19| Mr. Ghulam Muhammed Quaderâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Commerce  | 5-12-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 20| Mr. Hasanul Haq Inuâ | Ministerâ | 15-09-2012â | Ministry of Information  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 21| Mr. Muhammad Faruk Khanâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Civil Aviation and Tourism  | 5-12-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 22| Dr. Md. Abdur Razzaqueâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Food  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | 23| Dr. Md. Afsarul Ameenâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Primary and Mass Education  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 24| Dr. A. F. M. Ruhal Haqueâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 25| Dr. Dipu Moniâ | Ministerâ | 8-01-2009â | Ministry of Foreign Affairs  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 26| Mr. Nurul Islam Nahidâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Education  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 27| Mr. Abdul Latif Biswasâ | Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 28| Mr.Shajahan Khanâ | Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Shipping  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 29| Dr. Hasan Mahmudâ | Ministerâ | 28-11-2011â | Ministry of Environment and Forest  | 29-11-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 30| Mr. Abul Hasan Mahamood Aliâ | Ministerâ | 15-09-2012â | Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 31| Mr. Mostafa Faruque Mohammedâ | Ministerâ | 15-09- 2012â | Ministry of Information and Communication Technology  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 32| Mr. Md. Mazibul Hoqueâ | Ministerâ | 15-09-2012â | Ministry of Railways  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 33| MR. H.T. Imamâ | Adviserâ | 7-01-2009â | Public Administration Affairs  | 5-06-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 34| Dr. Mashiur Rahmanâ | Adviserâ | 7-01-2009â | Economic Adviser  | 22-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 35| Professor Dr. Syed Modasser Aliâ | Adviserâ | 7-01-2009â | Health and Family Welfare and Social Welfare Affairs  | 22-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 36| Dr. Alauddin Ahmedâ | Adviserâ | 7-01-2009â | Education, Social Development and Political Affairs  | 22-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 37| Dr. Tawfiq-E-Elahi Chowdhury, BB | Adviserâ | 14-01-2009â | Adviser to the Hon'ble Prime Minister  | 14-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 8| Dr. Gowher Rizviâ | Adviserâ | 9-07-2009â | International Relations Affairs  | 9-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 39| Advoca te Mostafizur Rahmanâ | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Land  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 40| Capt. A B Tajul Islam (Rtd. ) | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Liberation War Affairs  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 41| Arch. Yeafesh Osmanâ | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Science and Technology  | 5-12-2011â | Till Dateâ | | 42| Begum Monnujan Sufianâ | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Labor ; Employment  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 43| Mr.Dipankar Talukdarâ | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Chittagong Hill Tracts Affairs  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 44| Mr. Ahad Ali Sarkarâ | State Ministerâ | 6-01-2009â | Ministry of Youth and Sports  | 6-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 45| Advocate Md. Shahjahan Miahâ | State Ministerâ | 24-01-2009â | Ministry of Religious Affairs  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 46| Advocate Abdul Mannan Khanâ | State Ministerâ | 24-01-2009â | Ministry of Hou sing and Public Works  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 47| Advocate Md. Kamrul Islamâ | State Ministerâ | 24-07-2009â | Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | |Law and Justice Division  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Legislative and Parliamentary Affairs Division  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Parliament Secretariat  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 48| Advocate Shamsul Hoque Tukuâ | State Ministerâ | 24-01-2009â | Ministry of Home Affairs  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 49| Advocate Jahangir Kabir Nanakâ | State Ministerâ | 24-01-2009â | Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-agents  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Local Government Division  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Rural Development and Co-agents Division  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 50| Mr.Md. Motahar Hossainâ | State Ministerâ | 24-01-2009â | Ministry of Primary and Mass Education  | 24-01-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 51 | Mr. Muhammad Enamul Huqâ | State Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Power Division  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | Energy and Mineral Resources Division  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 52| Mr. Mozibur Rahman Fakirâ | State Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Health and Family Welfare  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 53| Mr. Promode Mankinâ | State Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Social Welfare  | 16-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | 54| Begum Shirin Sharmin Chaudhuryâ | State Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Women and Children Affairs  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 55| Mr. Md. Mahabubur Rahamanâ | State Ministerâ | 31-07-2009â | Ministry of Water Resources  | 31-07-2009â | Till Dateâ | | 56| Mr. Omor Faruk Chowdhuryâ | State Ministerâ | 15-09-2012â | Ministry of Industries  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 57| Mr. Md. Abdul Hyeeâ | State Ministerâ | 15-09-201 2â | Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock  | 15-09-2012â | Till Dateâ | | 58| Maj. Gen. (Retd) Tarique Ahmed Siddiqueâ | Adviser to the Hon'ble Prime Ministerâ | 8-01-2009â | |